Conventional cancer therapies risk causing damage to healthy tissue while working to destroy cancer cells. Researchers are developing novel therapeutics based on nanotechnology to overcome this limitation, as well as to improve the pharmacokinetics of a pharmaceutical and reduce the related toxicities (Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021;

Another encouraging area of nanotechnology in oncology is its use in enhancing immunotherapy (Nanoscale 2019; doi: 10.1039/c9nr05371a). T cells are important fighters in an immune response, and T cell-based immunotherapy of cancer is a rapidly developing field. While immunotherapy has already been established as an exciting and potentially highly effective treatment option for various types of cancer, one important challenge remains—stimulate antitumor immunity of primary T cells in vivo.

To tackle this issue, scientists at Ohio State University developed nanotechnology to boost activation of T cells at the cancer tumor site in a way that improved their interactions with an antibody therapy undergoing clinical trial testing. The study, which was conducted in mouse models of cancer, was published in the journal Nature Communications (2021;

The research was led by the Dong lab, which has long focused on nanoparticle delivery of messenger RNA (mRNA) as a therapeutic strategy. In the current study, the team hypothesized that delivery of costimulatory receptor mRNA to tumor-infiltrating T cells would enhance the antitumor effects of antibodies while lowering the chances for whole-body side effects.

To explore nanoparticles for delivering mRNA into T cells, the investigators designed and synthesized a library of phospholipid and glycolipid derivatives (PLs and GLs) and used these materials to devise biomimetic nanoparticles for mRNA delivery. The team chose to utilize the phospholipid-derived nanoparticle, PL1, to deliver the costimulatory receptor mRNA.

Next, the researchers loaded the nanoparticle cargo: (mRNA) carrying instructions to produce molecules that T cells express as part of their immune system function. The researchers injected these nanoparticles directly into the tumor site in mouse models of specific cancers, which entered tumor-infiltrating T cells to generate and amplify specific receptors on their surfaces enabling additional functions, including proliferation, recruitment of other immune cells, and production of helpful proteins.

The team waited 6 hours until the cells produced enough receptors and then injected antibodies into the tumors. The combination of PL1-OX40 mRNA and anti-OX40 antibody demonstrated significantly improved antitumor activity compared to anti-OX40 antibody alone in multiple tumor models. Tests of the combined treatment regimen produced the best results in mouse models of melanoma and B-cell lymphoma. Experimental monoclonal antibodies delivered 6 hours later could then bind to those receptors on T cells which triggered their cancer cell-killing functions. The nanoparticle and antibody delivery eliminated tumors in 60 percent of the mice—a significantly better outcome than treatment with the antibody alone. Moreover, the immune response enhancement had a lasting effect: lymphoma cells injected later into the treated tumor-free mice were unable to survive long enough to form tumors.

The new nanotechnology was effective in melanoma as well. When the team supplemented the combination treatment with the two additional antibodies that disrupt cancer cells’ ability to block the immune response, the approach resulted in a 50 percent complete response in the mice and protection against a later tumor rechallenge.

Oncology Times reached out to senior author, Yizhou Dong, PhD, for additional insights into their study. Dong is Associate Professor in the Division of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacology of the College of Pharmacy at The Ohio State University. His research focuses on the design and development of biotechnology platforms for the treatment of genetic disorders, infectious diseases, and cancers.

Oncology TimesA great number of nanoformulations have been reported as drug delivery systems to be applied in cancer treatment. What was the rationale for the design of this system?

Dong: “Phospholipids and glycolipids are natural components of the cell membrane. Taking advantage of this unique characteristic of these two types of lipids, we designed a library of phospholipid and glycolipid biomimetic materials (PL and GL lipids) to improve mRNA delivery. These PL and GL lipids are composed of a biomimetic head (phosphate head or glyco head), an ionizable amino core, and multiple hydrophobic tails. Their ionizable property makes them neutral at physiological pH and becomes positively charged at low pH.”

Oncology TimesWhat were some of the factors which posed challenges in the development of the nanoparticle delivery system of messenger RNA? What strategies were employed to surmount these challenges?

Dong: “Effective and safe delivery of mRNA remains the key challenge for clinical translation of nanoparticle formulations. We mimic nature using chemical structures such as phospholipid, glycolipid, and many other molecules from mammalian cells. By systematic exploration and optimization of the formulations, we can match delivery systems with therapeutic indications.”

Oncology TimesWhat are the potential clinical implications of the findings of this study?

Dong: “In this work, we developed a phospholipid-derived nanoparticle to deliver OX40 or CD137 mRNA to T cells in the tumor microenvironment, which enhances the efficacy of agonistic antibody therapy in preclinical tumor models. This treatment strategy is compatible with multiple administration routes and works in synergy with checkpoint inhibitors, demonstrating the broad applicability of this treatment regimen under diverse therapeutic situations. Additionally, the results lay a solid foundation for the exploration of more effective combinations using costimulatory receptors and agonistic antibodies for cancer immunotherapy.”

Oncology TimesNanotechnology targets cancer cells more exactly to spare healthy tissues. Are there any possible side effects of nanotechnology for cancer?

Dong: “Many strategies have been investigated to improve the targeting efficiency of cancer cells. Different from direct targeting cancer cells, we aim to modulate T cells in the tumor microenvironment using nanoparticles delivering mRNA encoding costimulatory receptors in combination with the corresponding agonistic antibody as a strategy to enhance cancer immunotherapy.”

Read the Article


Green Method to Make Nanoparticles and Ultrafine Powder

A novel freeze-dissolving approach has been devised that offers greater efficiency and sustainability compared to the classic freeze-drying process to make superfine powder or nanoparticles.​​​​​​​ In the research published in the journal ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, sphere-shaped [...]

Could gold nanoparticles help treat cancer?

Gold nanoparticles are minuscule particles made of gold. From drug and gene delivery to photothermal and photodynamic therapies to screening and diagnostic tests to radiation therapy, X-ray imaging and CT scans, these small particles [...]